Log in

Start Your Membership Now

Medicare Advantage programs that assigned financial risk for total cost of care to physicians via two-sided risk models had better beneficiary health outcomes and care efficiency compared with fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. The Medicare Advantage plans that used two-sided risk models performed better on all eight quality-of-care measures used in the comparison.

The comparison included data for 316,312 beneficiaries in Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada, Texas, and Utah who were enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan that used a two-sided risk model. The analysis compared the following quality-of-care measures:

Inpatient admissions: Compared . . .

Want To Read More? Log In Or Become A Paid Member
Resource Available For Paid OPEN MINDS Circle Members Only
Not a paid member? Don't miss out! Sign up today and receive unlimited organizational access to all OPEN MINDS strategic advice, market intelligence, and management best practices – over 250,000 resources!
Log In
If you are already a paid member, log in to your account to access this resource and more. If you are a free member, you will need to upgrade to a paid membership before accessing this resource.

Become A Paid Member
If you are not yet a paid member, learn more about the OPEN MINDS Circle Market Intelligence Service Membership on our website, reach out to our team at info@openminds.com, or call us at 877-350-6463.

Texas