Beyond FFS In ABA – Alternative Reimbursement Models To Improve Autism Treatment Quality & Reduce Costs—Back By Popular Demand is starting in

Register

Opinion In Civil Action No. 2026-0861: Aragon et al., v. Rollins et al.

The ruling was issued on June 22, 2026. The complaint alleged that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) improperly approved state pilots to set limits on the types of foods that could be purchased with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. Specifically, the pilots stated that SNAP benefits could not be used to purchase foods and beverages that the state defined as “junk food.” The ruling applies to Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee, and West Virginia.

The plaintiffs alleged that when the USDA approved the state pilot requests, it violated the Administrative Procedure Act. Specifically, the USDA exceeded its statutory authority . . .

Want To Read More? Log In Or Become A Paid Member
Resource Available For Paid OPEN MINDS Circle Members Only
Not a paid member? Don't miss out! Sign up today and receive unlimited organizational access to all OPEN MINDS strategic advice, market intelligence, and management best practices – over 250,000 resources!
If you are already a paid member, log in to your account to access this resource and more. If you are a free member, you will need to upgrade to a paid membership before accessing this resource.

If you are not yet a paid member, learn more about the OPEN MINDS Circle Market Intelligence Service Membership on our website, reach out to our team at info@openminds.com, or call us at 877-350-6463.

Tagged As: