Log in

Start Your Membership Now

April 1, 2010 The Coalition for Parity, Inc., sued the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to challenge the rule development process that resulted in the Interim Final Rule (IFR) for the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008. The Coalition, a group of managed behavioral health organizations, alleged that the federal departments charged with developing the rule failed to follow standard processes, which denied the plaintiffs due process to comment on a rule that materially affects their organizations. They requested a temporary restraining order to prevent the rule from . . .

Want To Read More? Log In Or Become A Paid Member
Resource Available For Paid OPEN MINDS Circle Members Only
Not a paid member? Don't miss out! Sign up today and receive unlimited organizational access to all OPEN MINDS strategic advice, market intelligence, and management best practices – over 250,000 resources!
Log In
If you are already a paid member, log in to your account to access this resource and more. If you are a free member, you will need to upgrade to a paid membership before accessing this resource.

Become A Paid Member
If you are not yet a paid member, learn more about the OPEN MINDS Circle Market Intelligence Service Membership on our website, reach out to our team at info@openminds.com, or call us at 877-350-6463.

Market Intelligence Resource | April 1, 2010

Coalition for Parity Inc., v. Sebelius et al., Memorandum Opinion

April 1, 2010 The Coalition for Parity, Inc., sued the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to challenge the rule development process that resulted in the Interim Final Rule (IFR) for the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008. The Coalition, a group of managed behavioral health organizations, alleged that the federal departments charged with developing the rule failed to follow standard processes, which denied the plaintiffs due process to comment on a rule that materially affects their organizations. They requested a temporary restraining order to prevent the rule from . . .

Want To Read More? Log In Or Become A Paid Member
Resource Available For Paid OPEN MINDS Circle Members Only
Not a paid member? Don't miss out! Sign up today and receive unlimited organizational access to all OPEN MINDS strategic advice, market intelligence, and management best practices – over 250,000 resources!
Log In
If you are already a paid member, log in to your account to access this resource and more. If you are a free member, you will need to upgrade to a paid membership before accessing this resource.

Become A Paid Member
If you are not yet a paid member, learn more about the OPEN MINDS Circle Market Intelligence Service Membership on our website, reach out to our team at info@openminds.com, or call us at 877-350-6463.