January 9, 2012
The lawsuit Bagnall et al. v. Sebelius, was filed on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries who had been subject to an observation stay at a hospital, rather than being admitted. The plaintiffs alleged that the outpatient treatments offered during hospital observation services are basically the same as those furnished to inpatients, and should be considered inpatient services. The court dismissed the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court stated that the case should also be dismissed because recognition of observation services as outpatient services comports . . .

Want To Read More? Log In Or Become A Paid Member
Resource Available For Paid OPEN MINDS Circle Members Only
Not a paid member? Don't miss out! Sign up today and receive unlimited organizational access to all OPEN MINDS strategic advice, market intelligence, and management best practices – over 250,000 resources!
If you are already a paid member, log in to your account to access this resource and more. If you are a free member, you will need to upgrade to a paid membership before accessing this resource.

If you are not yet a paid member, learn more about the OPEN MINDS Circle Market Intelligence Service Membership on our website, reach out to our team at info@openminds.com, or call us at 877-350-6463.

Tagged As: